Policy answers
Workflow
Review an answer against an owned policy source set.
Evidence to inspect
Source identity, version, passage and signal status.
Acceptance question
Can the reviewer distinguish supported, contradicted and missing evidence?
Give review
a concrete starting point.
Explore a workflow where the basis of an answer matters as much as the answer itself.
Scenario
Start with the review decision.
A concrete example makes the first evaluation easier to define.
Use this starting point →
Scenarios describe evaluation opportunities, not customer deployments or regulatory approvals.
Illustrative opportunities
Give the reviewer something specific to establish.
A policy answer with context.
An employee asks a policy question. The reviewer needs to see the version presented and whether the offered evidence supports the answer.
A summary with a review trail.
A team synthesises a collection of documents. It needs to distinguish source references, missing dates and heuristic signals before reusing the result.
A recommendation someone can challenge.
Before a result enters a business process, a reviewer inspects the declared basis and records an acceptance or escalation decision.
A source change that remains visible.
A document is revised or retired. The evaluation asks how the source version and serving-removal event are represented and communicated.
Illustrative evaluation scenarios. These are not customer deployments or regulatory-approval claims.
Evaluation gates
A focused evaluation, with explicit gates.
| Gate | Evidence to agree |
|---|---|
| 1. Workflow | One task, source owner, reviewer and clear decision boundary. |
| 2. Records | Required source identifiers, versions, signal disclosures and checks. |
| 3. Evaluation | Representative supported, contradicted and silent-source examples; subgroup results. |
| 4. Operations | Integration boundary, retention needs, escalation and source retirement. |
| 5. Acceptance | Written criteria, unresolved risks and a decision owner. |
Start small enough to learn
Bring supported, contradicted and unanswered examples.
A representative source set and explicit edge cases provide a stronger basis than one aggregate score.